Columbia River Carbonates v. Port of Woodland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s denial of defendant’s request for documents for preparation of post-conviction petition where no matters were pending in the court in accordance with Ballem
• rejecting Martin’s argument that requested discovery was necessary in order for him to pursue PCRA relief and in so doing, affirming the court’s denial of Martin’s motion for discovery based upon no pending action before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).