Colton v. Onderdonk
Citations
- 69 Cal. 155
- 10 P. 398
- 1886 Cal. LEXIS 645
Syllabus
<p>Trespass—Action to Recover for—Devisee in Possession may Maintain. •— One who is in possession of land as a sole devisee, pending the settlement of the estate of the testator, may maintain an action in her individual name to recover damages for a trespass committed thereon after the death of the testator, and while she is in possession.</p> <p>Id. —Judgment in Favor of Devisee — Bar to Recovery by Executrix. — If the devisee is also the executrix of the will of the devisor, a recovery hy her in such an action is a bar to a subsequent recovery in an action instituted by her in her representative capacity.</p> <p>Pleading — Complaint — Ambiguity—Demubrer.—An objection to a complaint on the ground of ambiguity must be taken advantage of by a special demurrer; otherwise the defect is waived.</p> <p>Id.—Blasting Books in City—Liability for Damages. — Where the owner of a lot situated in a large city, and contiguous to the dwelling-house of another, uses gunpowder to blast out rocks on his lot, he is liable for the damage proximately and naturally resulting to the house of the adjoining owner from the act of blasting, whether the damage was caused by rocks thrown against th^ house or by a concussion of the air around it.</p> <p>Id.—Unreasonable Use of Property — Skill in Use. — Such a use of property is unreasonable, unusual, and unnatural, and no care or skill exercised in the use will excuse the owner from liability for the damages proximately and naturally resulting from the blasting.</p> <p>Excessive Judgment — Verdict.—A judgment entered for an amount in excess of the verdict is erroneous, and will be modified on appeal.</p>
Judges: Foote
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Whitman Hotel Corporation v. Elliott & Watrous Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1951-03-13· cited 101×
- Green v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-08-20· cited 81×
- Fitz Simons & Connell Co. v. Braun & FittsIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-10-25· cited 77×
- Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-02-03· cited 63×
- Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Second Circuit· 1931-12-14· cited 59×
- Alonso v. HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-01-30· cited 47×
- Smith v. Lockheed Propulsion Co.California Court of Appeal· 1967-01-17· cited 47×
- Spano v. Perini Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1969-06-05· cited 46×
- Wendt v. Yant Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1933-07-20· cited 46×
- Patrick v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1913-09-15· cited 41×
- Watson v. Mississippi River Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1916-02-09· cited 39×
- Yukon Equipment, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-11-03· cited 27×
- Garden of the Gods Village, Inc. v. HellmanSupreme Court of Colorado· 1956-03-05· cited 26×
- Opal v. Material Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1956-04-30· cited 23×
- Ahrens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-01-22· cited 22×
- Gallin v. PoulouCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-04-10· cited 21×
- Wren v. DixonNevada Supreme Court· 1916-10-15· cited 21×
- Chavez v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.E.D. California· 1976-05-12· cited 19×
- Blackford v. Heman Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1908-06-23· cited 19×
- Gossett v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1905-09-15· cited 19×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Shipley v. Fifty AssociatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1870-11-15· cited 77×
- Cahill v. EastmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1872-01-15· cited 60×
- Wilson v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1871-10-15· cited 51×
- In re Estate of WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court· 1867-07-01· cited 42×
- City of Joliet v. HarwoodIllinois Supreme Court· 1877-09-15· cited 42×
- Ball v. NyeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1868-09-15· cited 38×
- Aubuchon v. LorySupreme Court of Missouri· 1856-03-15· cited 17×
- Sweetland v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1874-03-18· cited 9×
- Dickinson v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court· 1858-07-01· cited 8×
- Darling v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1873-09-15· cited 8×
- Lyman v. WebberSupreme Court of Vermont· 1845-03-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.