Colt Industries, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Colt does not explain how penalties designed to return [the violating party] to the status quo ante compensate the government.”
• “EPA is not authorized under either the Clean Air or Clean Water [A]cts to seek compensatory damages; it is limited to injunctive relief and the maximum monetary penalties prescribed by 42 U.S.C. § 7413(b), and 33 U.S.C. § 1319, respectively.”
• subsequent legislative history is entitled to little weight
• subsequent legislative history is entitled to little weight

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).