Colson v. Hillman Land & Iron Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To the extent that the Petition raises issues of the 28 proper application of state law, they are beyond the purview of this Court in a federal habeas proceeding.” (citing Swarthout v.562 U.S. 216 (2011))
• “[T]he Supreme Court has not resolved whether a non-capital prisoner may be entitled to habeas relief based on a freestanding claim of actual innocence.” (citing McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 392 (2013); House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518, 554–55 (2006

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).