Colpo v. GENERAL TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 326, ETC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The sparse legislative history cited by the parties is of little aid in resolving the controversy.”
• injunction “necessary if Mr. Colpo’s rights ... to have any meaning”
• court might refuse to aid union member acting for employer’s benefit
• supporting interpretation with references to Congress’ democratic objectives
• sentence ends with two independent clauses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).