Colortyme Financial Services, Inc. v. Kivalina Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there could be no argument that it would be inconvenient for a Texas citizen to litigate in Texas
• holding that there could be no argument that it would be inconvenient for a Texas citizen to litigate in Texas
• explaining that under the first-to- 26 file rule, if an action should have been brought as a counterclaim to another pending action, 27 “the later-filed action should be stayed, transferred or dismissed with leave to plead the 28 counterclaims in the prior pending action”
• “[M]ost importantly, there can be no argument that it would be inconvenient for [the plaintiff], a Texas citizen, to litigate in Texas, especially where it already is embroiled in litigation there.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).