Colorado Wild Public Lands v. United States Forest Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the efficiency and economy of litigation ... is a principal purpose of the [class action] procedure”
• holding that the filing of a class action tolls the statute of limitations on all individual claims covered by the class
• recognizing that American Pipe “established that commencement of a class action tolls the applicable statute of limitations as to all members of the class”
• holding that commencement of a class action under Rule 23 tolls the statute of limitations
• holding that a district court’s decision that attempted intervenors’ claims were not entitled to tolling, and thus were absolutely barred by the statute of limitations, was a conclusion of law
• concluding that a “principal purpose” of Rule 23 is “efficiency and economy of litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).