Skip to main content
· 10/16/1975

Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd. v. Rizzo

Citations

  • 524 F.2d 571
  • 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of motion to file amended complaint setting forth an entirely new cause of action that was not suggested in the original complaint and that was proposed only after the statute of limitations had expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Dusen, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.