Skip to main content
· 1/8/2009

Colorado Ethics Watch v. City and County of Broomfield

Citations

  • 203 P.3d 623
  • 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 1
  • 2009 WL 37595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the plaintiffs argument that “for the purpose of’ in section 2(5)(a)(IV) of article XXVIII of the Colorado Constitution should be construed to mean “with the effect of’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Furman, Graham, Terry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.