· 1/8/2009
Colorado Ethics Watch v. City and County of Broomfield
Citations
- 203 P.3d 623
- 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 1
- 2009 WL 37595
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the plaintiffs argument that “for the purpose of’ in section 2(5)(a)(IV) of article XXVIII of the Colorado Constitution should be construed to mean “with the effect of’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Furman, Graham, Terry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.