Colonna's Shipyard, Inc. v. United States
Syllabus
REPORTED OPINION of the court's sealed OPINION and ORDER issued on December 23, 2019, ECF No. [29], defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part, as to Counts I, II, and IV of the complaint, and DENIED in part as to Count III of the complaint. Pursuant to RCFC 54(b), as there is no just reason for delay, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment, dismissing Counts I, II, and IV of the complaint, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Service on parties made.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing it is the judicial branch’s function to interpret the law and the legislature’s role to set policy and enact law
- during relevant time period, WLAD used definition of “disability” found in the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)
- citing, among other authority, 4 No. 34968-3-111 Lopez v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803)
- appellate court \review[s] all constitutional challenges de novo\ (citing State v. Jones , 159 Wash.2d 231 , 237, 149 P.3d 636 (2006) )
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Patricia E. Campbell-Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.