Colonial Supply Co. v. Atlas Minerals Products Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding subro-gation claim against SEPTA under the Workers Compensation Act was barred on the basis of sovereign immunity
• explaining that “this Court should construe statutes to give effect to all of their provisions, and should not ignore language nor render any portion of the statute superfluous”
• “When examining a statute, we are bound by its plain language; accordingly, we should not insert words into the [statute] that are plainly not there.”
• “[T]his Court should construe statutes to give effect to all of their provisions, and should not ignore language nor render any portion of the statute superfluous.”
• “[A] [c]ourt should construe statutes to give effect to all of their provisions, and should not ignore language nor render any portion of the statute superfluous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).