Skip to main content
· 7/8/2009

Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. Medley

Citations

  • 572 F.3d 22
  • 22 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1
  • 47 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1310
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14930
  • 2009 WL 1942070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding preemption defense not “facially conclusive” when it turned on an unsettled question of law
  • noting that the court must make Younger abstention decision before reaching merits
  • finding “facially conclusive” exception inapplicable where factual disputes remained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Tashima, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.