Colonial Leasing Co. of New England v. Larsen Bros. Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing because the trial judge did not expressly determine that the contract was integrated
• “Because the parol evidence rule applies only if the writing was intended by the parties to represent the full and complete agreement of the parties, the [district] court must first determine whether the writing was intended to be an integrated agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).