Skip to main content

Colon v. State

Citations

  • 869 So. 2d 1290
  • 2004 WL 840622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming convictions and sentences because “unpre-served sentencing error cannot be corrected in an Anders case”
  • affirming convictions and sentences because \unpreserved sentencing error cannot be corrected in an Anders case\
  • affirming convictions and sentences because “unpre-served sentencing error cannot be corrected in an Anders case”
  • affirming convictions and sentences because \unpreserved sentencing error cannot be corrected in an Anders case\
  • affirming convictions and sentences because “unpreserved sentencing error cannot be corrected in an Anders [v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) ] case”
  • “[O]ur affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s filing an appropriate post-conviction motion raising any such unpreserved sentencing issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.