Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Collum v. Paypal

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 342
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 159
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3185
  • 571 U.S. 890
  • 2013 WL 4402300
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 6565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding regulation of take of purely intrastate, noncommercial delta smelt as essential part of ESA’s comprehensive regulatory scheme
  • rejecting argument that litigant had abandoned claim where opposing party’s summary judgment motion placed the issue before the district court, the district court ruled on that issue, and the litigant adequately raised the issue on appeal
  • “Pursuant to Raich, when a statute is challenged under the Commerce Clause, courts must evaluate the aggregate effect of the statute (rather than an isolated application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.