Collom v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]orphed child pornography that uses images of real children ... is not covered by the Ashcroft definition of protected virtual child pornography.”
• \[M]orphed child pornography that uses images of real children . . . is not covered by the Ashcroft definition of protected virtual child pornography.\
• \Ashcroft did not impose a heightened evidentiary burden on the state to ... use expert testimony to prove that the image contains a real child\
• refusing to extend Ashcroft to cover morphed child pornography

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).