Collins v. Throckmorton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the adverse “inference does not amount to substantive proof and cannot take the place of proof of a fact necessary to the [plaintiffs] case”
• “It’s clear to me that you control the Cloudvara documents. You need to respond to those [discovery requests].”
• adverse inference not appropriate because evidence was lost through no fault of plaintiff
• recovery of attorney fees and interest at contract rate was not allowed
• noting adverse inference would be appropriate for spoliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).