Collins v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When interpreting the terms of a consent decree, the court applies general contract principles using the law of the state where the agreement was made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Evoqua Water Techs. v. M.W. Watermark
  Sixth Circuit· 2019-10-07· cited 39×
• Jeff D. v. Kempthorne
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-04-23· cited 34×
• Ogbuehi v. Comcast of California/Colorado/Florida/Oregon, Inc.
  E.D. California· 2014-10-02· cited 23×
• Arata v. Nu Skin International, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-09-25· cited 11×
• Alexander v. Britt
  Fourth Circuit· 1996-07-16
• West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. ERP Environmental Fund, Inc
  Fourth Circuit· 2024-04-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• California v. LaRue
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-20· cited 833×
• Berg v. Hudesman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-12-06· cited 543×
• Miller v. Morongo Band of Mission Indians
  Supreme Court· 1989-01-09· cited 132×
• Joseph Toussaint v. Daniel McCarthy Joseph Toussaint v. James Rowland, Director, California Department of Corrections Daniel Vasquez Robert Borg
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-02-27· cited 69×
• GAF Corp. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1992-01-27· cited 57×
• Bishop Collins v. Gerald Thompson
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-06-08· cited 49×
• Thompson v. Enomoto
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-10-04· cited 30×
• Collins v. Thompson
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-10-25· cited 28×