Collins v. Shelley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs were limited to compensatory damages on a wantonness claim when they “did not state a claim for punitive damages in the ad damnum clause of their complaint”
• testimony that the speed of the defendant's automobile was 20 to 25 miles per hour at the point of impact with the plaintiff in an intersection provided an inference that defendant ran a stop sign, and, consequently, presented a jury question as to wantonness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).