Collins v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that the Legislature, by creating section 668.14, intended a virtual abrogration, or at least a broad scale limitation of the collateral source rule for unintended torts
• The court has “long accepted the maxim that express mention of one thing in a statute implies exclusion of others.”
• \In interpreting a statute we necessarily begin with the statute's language.\
• “In interpreting a statute we necessarily begin with the statute’s language.”
• reviewing disability insurance setoff for correction of errors at law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).