Skip to main content
· 9/24/2007

Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc.

Citations

  • 505 F.3d 874
  • 26 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 961
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22613
  • 2007 WL 2756956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that arbitrators 5 “generally are entitled to determine in the first instance whether to give [a] prior judicial 6 determination preclusive effect”
  • stating that defensive collateral estoppel “‘occurs 8 when a defendant seeks to prevent a plaintiff from asserting a claim the plaintiff has previously 9 litigated and lost against another defendant’”
  • stating that defensive collateral estoppel “‘occurs when a 24 defendant seeks to prevent a plaintiff from asserting a claim the plaintiff has previously litigated 25 and lost against another defendant’”
  • setting forth narrow grounds on which courts may vacate an arbitration award, which include prejudicial misconduct by the arbitrator, action that exceeds an arbitrator’s power, and manifest disregard of the law
  • setting forth the narrow grounds on which courts may vacate an arbitration award
  • setting forth the limited grounds on which courts may vacate an arbitration award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dorothy W. Nelson, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.