District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/30/2004
Collins v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Citations
- 894 So. 2d 988
- 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20185
- 2004 WL 3010469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing standing to sue for diminished value of vehicle under Florida equivalent of DTPA
- holding that plaintiff’s complaint that the value of her car was less because it was equipped with Gen-3 seatbelt buckles is actionable under the state consumer protection law even though the alleged defect has never manifest itself in an emergency or caused damages
- defining alleged injury arising from defective seatbelts as “insufficient product value”
- “[Plaintiff] claims an actual injury in the form of insufficient product value. In other words, she contends that she did not get what she bargained for.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orfinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. InmanTexas Supreme Court· 2008-04-04· cited 336×
- Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-03· cited 147×
- Geri Siano Carriuolo v. General Motors CompanyEleventh Circuit· 2016-05-17· cited 128×
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2012-07-19· cited 85×
- Huu Nguyen v. Nissan North America, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2019-07-26· cited 62×
- Smith v. WM. WRIGLEY JR. CO.S.D. Florida· 2009-10-01· cited 30×
- Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCSixth Circuit· 2025-06-27· cited 25×
- Saltzman v. Pella Corp.N.D. Illinois· 2009-06-04· cited 17×
- Melton v. Century Arms, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2017-03-20· cited 16×
- Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. Timeshares Direct, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-07· cited 11×
- Carriuolo v. General Motors LLCS.D. Florida· 2014-12-11· cited 5×
- Sanchez-Knutson v. Ford Motor Co.S.D. Florida· 2016-04-06· cited 5×
- Gastaldi v. Sunvest Resort Communities, LCS.D. Florida· 2010-03-04· cited 4×
- Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. Bill Inman, David Castro, and John Wilkins, Each Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly SituatedTexas Supreme Court· 2008-02-01
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2002-05-02· cited 194×
- Rollins, Inc. v. HellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-26· cited 110×
- Davis v. Powertel, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-29· cited 105×
- Raye v. Fred Oakley Motors, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1983-01-18· cited 29×
- FORT LAUDERDALE LINCOLN v. CorgnatiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-22· cited 27×
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. InmanTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-11-20· cited 24×
- Hubbel v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-20· cited 20×
- Marshall v. W & L ENTERPRISES CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-07-25· cited 16×
- Smith v. 2001 South Dixie Highway, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-12· cited 12×
- H & J PAVING OF FLORIDA, INC. v. Nextel, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-21· cited 8×
- Compscript, Inc. v. Agency for Healthcare AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.