Collins v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing standing to sue for diminished value of vehicle under Florida equivalent of DTPA
• holding that plaintiff’s complaint that the value of her car was less because it was equipped with Gen-3 seatbelt buckles is actionable under the state consumer protection law even though the alleged defect has never manifest itself in an emergency or caused damages
• defining alleged injury arising from defective seatbelts as “insufficient product value”
• “[Plaintiff] claims an actual injury in the form of insufficient product value. In other words, she contends that she did not get what she bargained for.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).