Skip to main content

Collins v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 409 S.E.2d 175
  • 13 Va. App. 177
  • 8 Va. Law Rep. 1066
  • 1991 Va. App. LEXIS 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the fact finder “could have found” that the defendant had slipped as he “exited the car,” but it found instead that he “threw drugs under the vehicle,” and that finding is “binding” on appeal
  • observing that cocaine is “something of significant value and not something that one is likely to have abandoned or carelessly left in the area there”
  • noting that the trial court could “discount” the possibility of drugs being abandoned because “the cocaine was ‘something of significant value and not something that one is likely to have abandoned or carelessly left in the area there’”
  • finding sufficient evidence to prove constructive possession where defendant \made a throwing motion under the vehicle with his right arm\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duff, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.