Collins v. Claudy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee did not have liberty interest in a career with Air Force Civil Service specifically
• holding that sovereign immunity bars “a remedy [against the government] for a constitutional violation”
• explaining that even when a plaintiff cannot “successfully claim a constitutionally cognizable property interest,” it is “well-settled ... that regulations validly prescribed by an agency are binding upon it”
• explaining that even when a plaintiff cannot “successfully claim a constitutionally cognizable property interest,” it is “well-settled . . . that regulations validly pre- scribed by an agency are binding upon it”
• “A mere command to follow certain procedures, however, does not create an underlying prop- erty interest, even when the command is derived from the Constitution.”
• “[t]o the extent that plaintiff’s Bivens claims are founded in actions proscribed by Title VII, they may not be maintained because Title VII provides the exclusive remedy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).