Collins v. Bonar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• equating “testimony which is so uncertain or inadequate” with being “equivocal” and stating that “[w]here testimony is so inadequate or contradictory!, i.e. equivocal] that ... findings of fact based upon it become mere conjecture, it fails to meet the test of substantiality”
• testimony which is so uncertain, equivocal, or ambiguous to support the findings of a trial judge is not substantial as a matter of law
• testimony which is so uncertain, equivocal, or ambiguous to support the findings of a trial judge is not substantial as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).