Collins & Aikman Products Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an applicant for relief before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records had not shown “that the documentation supporting the application required his personal appearance before the board”
• “It is clear that no formal hearing during the line-of-duty investigation is required by Army regulations.”
• amount of process that is “due” varies with the circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).