Skip to main content
· 6/15/1995

Collins & Aikman Products Co. v. Building Systems, Inc. And U.S. Commercial Floor System

Citations

  • 58 F.3d 16
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15053
  • 1995 WL 361721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a clause “submitting to arbitration ‘[a]ny claim or controversy arising out of or relating to th[e] agreement,’ is the paradigm of a broad clause.”
  • holding that a clause “submitting to arbitration ‘[a]ny claim or controversy arising out of or relating to th[e] agreement,’ is the paradigm of a broad clause”
  • holding that an arbitration clause referencing “any claim or controversy arising out of or relating to the agreement” was “the paradigm of a broad clause”
  • holding that a clause “submitting to arbitration ‘[a]ny claim or controversy arising out of or relating to th[e] agreement,’ is the paradigm of a broad clause”
  • holding that a clause “submitting to arbitration ‘[a]ny claim or controversy arising out of or relating to th[e] agreement,’ is the paradigm of a broad clause”
  • holding that a clause “submitting to arbitration ‘[a]ny claim or controversy arising out of or relating to th[e] agreement,’ is the paradigm of a broad clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altimari, Jacobs, Calabresi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.