Collings v. City First Mortgage Services, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[w]hile it may be that further expenses were incurred by Yale, they were not satisfactorily shown at trial by either Uku’s testimony or [the Appellants’] documentary evidence.”
• jury was properly instructed that it could draw adverse inference from absence of doctor’s office notes where doctor accounted for their absence by claiming that he did not take notes but only “scribbled ‘notations’ ” and that his office files had been “thinned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).