Collier v. Merck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's letter to trial court, written in the present tense, was sufficient to trigger inquiry
• holding that the Maryland resisting arrest statute retains the offense’s common law elements
• holding that the Maryland resisting arrest statute retains the offense’s common law elements
• noting that “the onus [is] on the [circuit [c]ourt to ‘permit the defendant to explain the reasons for the request.’ ”
• “(1) [T]he defendant was arrested; (2) the arrest was lawful; and (3) the defendant refused to submit to the arrest.”
• “(1) [T]he defendant was arrested; (2) the arrest was lawful; and (3) the defendant refused to submit to the arrest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).