Skip to main content
· 5/4/1993

Collier v. Locicero

Citations

  • 820 F. Supp. 673
  • 1993 WL 172671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “evidence indicating that a frisk was ‘excessively rough or intrusive’ is sufficient to raise questions of fact” regarding a Fourth Amendment claim
  • noting that evidence indicating a search was excessively intrusive may be sufficient to raise questions of fact that preclude judgment as a matter of law
  • “There is no basis in the law of this Circuit for a theory of joint and several liability for violations of constitutional rights.”
  • “[I]t is abundantly clear that defendant Osso had the authority to detain and frisk the plaintiff,” who was encountered on the scene as the officers were executing a search warrant
  • “[I]t is abundantly clear that defendant Osso had the authority to detain and frisk the plaintiff,” who was encountered on the scene as the officers were executing a search warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jos㉠A. Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.