Collette v. Tolleson Unified School District, No. 214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding in part that defendant owed no duty to protect plaintiff in absence of evidence of unreasonable risk of harm
• stating that a duty would not be imposed upon a school as to its student’s conduct when (i) it had no personal control over student’s actual operation of his vehicle; (ii) it has no power to decide which students are authorized to drive; and (iii
• \no benefit in imposing a duty upon a school district concerning the conduct of students over which it has no control\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).