Collett v. Insurance Co. of the West

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that materially similar “work completed exclusion” removed coverage, for claim for damages relating to repair and replacement of collapsed retaining wall defectively constructed by insured
• holding that a building inspector hired by masonry contractor was not a “subcontractor,” even under the broadest definition of that term
• holding that an inspector the insured hired was not a “subcontractor” because “[w]hile the inspector may have failed to catch defects in the retaining walls, he did not put them there[, the insured] did”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).