Skip to main content
· 3/28/1928

Collegiate World Publishing Co v. Du Pont Publishing Co.

Citations

  • 25 F.2d 1018
  • 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the district court also properly considered whether prejudgment interest would amount to a windfall recovery”
  • “As a general rule, a general jury verdict will be upheld only if there is substantial evidence to support each and every theory of liability submitted to the jury.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.