Skip to main content
· 9/28/2005

Colleen M. v. Fertility & Surgical Associates of Thousand Oaks

Citations

  • 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 439
  • 132 Cal. App. 4th 1466
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 11805
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8682
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Without at least some evidence of the mail handling and routing procedures in the office the fact the attorney was never aware of the documents does not rebut the presumption they were received.”
  • discussing the effect of the presumption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.