Skip to main content
· 7/17/1989

Colleen Donnelly, Cross-Appellant v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 874 F.2d 402
  • 1989 WL 42603

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff’s amended complaint asserting federal claims “clearly relates back to the date of the original complaint,” which alleged only a claim under the Illinois Human Rights Act
  • concluding that a Title VII claim “clearly relate[d] back” to the filing of a discrimination claim under a state’s human rights act “[b]ecause the Title VII and IHRA [Illinois Human Rights Act] claims are based upon identical facts and circumstances”
  • holding post-removal amended complaint alleging Title VII discrimination claims related back to pre-removal state court complaint alleging state law discrimination claims arising out of the same conduct
  • Title VII claims found to relate back to IHRA claims “[b]ecause the Title VII and IHRA claims are based upon identical facts and circumstances”
  • discussing calculation of damages under Title VII
  • discussing calculation of damages under Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cummings, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.