Collar v. Murillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pleadings to be read broadly and realistically, not narrowly and technically
• pleadings to be read broadly and realistically, not narrowly and technically.
• “[t]he existence of a report by a medical expert may be, but is not necessarily, sufficient to establish the plaintiffs’ good faith belief’ under § 52-190a [a]
• “the general purpose of § 52-190a is to discourage the filing of baseless lawsuits against health care providers”
• recent legislative action amending section 4-183 of the UAPA provides that certain infirmities do not deprive the court of jurisdiction
• good faith certificate as prerequisite to medical malpractice action not subject matter jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).