Skip to main content
· 6/18/1924

Coll v. Desha

Citations

  • 27 Haw. 855
  • 1924 Haw. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that any change in DC must be specifically explained
  • remanding for Board to provide reasons or bases for the various diagnostic codes used by VA throughout its adjudication process
  • finding Board error where it misapplied the terms of the applicable DC
  • one Diagnostic Code may be more appropriate than another based on such factors as the Veteran's relevant medical history, his current diagnosis, and demonstrated symptomatology
  • any change in a diagnostic code by a VA adjudicator must be specifically explained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindsay, Perry, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.