· 6/18/1924
Coll v. Desha
Citations
- 27 Haw. 855
- 1924 Haw. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that any change in DC must be specifically explained
- remanding for Board to provide reasons or bases for the various diagnostic codes used by VA throughout its adjudication process
- finding Board error where it misapplied the terms of the applicable DC
- one Diagnostic Code may be more appropriate than another based on such factors as the Veteran's relevant medical history, his current diagnosis, and demonstrated symptomatology
- any change in a diagnostic code by a VA adjudicator must be specifically explained
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lindsay, Perry, Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.