Colette Luckie v. Ameritech Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statement offered to show the state of mind of a supervisor at the time she evaluated an employee was not hearsay
• holding that a statement offered to show the state of mind of a supervisor at the time she evaluated an employee was not hearsay
• holding that no hostile work environment existed where “the conduct in question consists of isolated events that were not physically threatening or humiliating and in some cases were not even directed at [plaintiff]”
• requiring that the allegedly hostile conduct have a “racial character or purpose” in order to support a hostile work environment claim
• dismissing retaliation claim where “[n]othing alleged in the complaint suggests [defendant’s] knowledge of Plaintiffs’ protected activity or any retaliatory motive”
• affirming summary judgment for defendant because, among other things, the alleged harassment was not overtly racial, humiliating, or physically threatening

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).