Skip to main content
· 6/23/1887

Coles' Heirs v. Coles' Ex'or

Citations

  • 83 Va. 525
  • 5 S.E. 673
  • 1887 Va. LEXIS 96

Syllabus

<p>1. Judicial Sales&emdash;Inadequacy of price.&emdash;-Whilst no test of adequacy ap- plies to all cases, and this court is averse to refusing to confirm a sale on the mere ground of inadequacy, yet it will always do so where the inadequacy is so gross as to amount to a sacrifice of the property.</p> <p>2. Idem&emdash; Upset bids&emdash;Case at bar.&emdash;Ordinarily a sale will be set aside and the biddings re-opened at any time before confirmation, upon the offer of a substantial upset bid. In this case the upset bid was improperly rejected.</p>

Judges: Hinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.