· 2/24/1954
Coles Cranes, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 32 Cust. Ct. 108
- 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1693
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that issue preclusion can bar the second contest of an issue if it has been “resolved by a prior judgment.”
- explaining that, in such circumstances, “[t]he Government is barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause from challenging the acquittal”
- “The parties use the expression ‘collateral estoppel [],’ but as this Court has observed, ‘issue preclusion’ is the more descriptive term.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ford, Laweence, Rao, Whence
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.