Skip to main content
· 2/24/1954

Coles Cranes, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 32 Cust. Ct. 108
  • 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issue preclusion can bar the second contest of an issue if it has been “resolved by a prior judgment.”
  • explaining that, in such circumstances, “[t]he Government is barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause from challenging the acquittal”
  • “The parties use the expression ‘collateral estoppel [],’ but as this Court has observed, ‘issue preclusion’ is the more descriptive term.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ford, Laweence, Rao, Whence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.