Coleman v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that judicial admissions have the effect of withdrawing facts from issue without the need for further evidentiary proof, and are binding on the admitting party
• holding trial court decisions, with few exceptions, are not binding on this Court
• stating that 6 This exhibit was provided to Knoll the day before trial. See N.T., 3/12- 13/14, at 7; see also Trial Court Opinion, 2/13/15, at 4 (noting that the Appellants “were guilty of repeated discovery violations.”
• stating that “[a]n unpublished Superior Court memorandum decision [filed before May 2, 2019] shall not be relied upon or cited by a Court or a party in any other action or proceeding, except that such a memorandum decision may be relied upon or cited (1
• Thus, under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, depositions and interrogatory answers are not binding admissions.”
• “Failure of a non-moving party to adduce sufficient evidence on an issue essential to his case and on which he bears the burden of proof establishes the entitlement of the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).