Coleman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a statute is ambiguous if it is susceptible to two or more reasonable interpretations
• recognizing the court's ability to review legislative history to resolve a statute's ambiguity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ibarra v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-09-13· cited 3×
• PROTECTIVE INS. CO. v. STATE, COMM'R OF INS.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2025-01-16· cited 3×
• AMAZON.COM SERVS., LLC v. MALLOY (NRAP 5)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2025-10-30· cited 2×
• DIAMOND NAT. RES. PROT. AND CONSERVATION ASS'N v. DIAMOND VALLEY RANCH, LLC
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2022-06-16· cited 1×
• IBARRA (GABRIEL) VS. STATE
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-09-13
• PIZARRO (KARLO) v. STATE (CRIMINAL)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2025-09-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• Middleton v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 124×
• State v. Catanio
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-12-29· cited 75×
• Buschauer v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 33×
• Romero v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2000-03-13· cited 5×