Skip to main content

Coleman v. State

Citations

  • 145 S.W.3d 649
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1613
  • 2004 WL 2179857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that evidence is not insufficient merely because appellant offered a different explanation for the facts
  • noting that a person can “use” a weapon without exhibiting it, but not the other way around
  • holding that the “cumulative effect” of evidence regarding the home’s large amounts of drugs and money in proximity to the guns “could have allowed a rational jury to determine that [defendant] used the weapons to protect the narcotics and the proceeds therefrom.”
  • stating that defendant’s proximity to guns at time of search is not dispositive
  • finding a link between the accused and the drugs when the drugs are found in an enclosed space
  • finding a link between the accused and the drugs when the drugs are found in an enclosed space

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Cochran, Price, Johnson, Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.