Skip to main content
· 3/25/1988

Coleman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 752 P.2d 645
  • 242 Kan. 804
  • 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 170
  • 1988 Kan. LEXIS 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assuming that an adequate alternative remedy would preclude a common law cause of action for retaliatory discharge
  • overrulingArmstrong v. Goldblatt Tool Co., 242 Kan. 164, 747 P.2d 119 [1987]; Smith v. United Technologies, 240 Kan. 562, 731 P.2d 871 [1987]; Cox v. United Technologies, 240 Kan. 95, 727 P.2d 456 [1986]
  • allowing employer to discharge employee for being absent as the result of a work-related injury would allow employer to indirectly fire employee for filing workers' compensation claim, contrary to public policy of state
  • absences caused by employee’s work-related injuries could not be counted against her for purposes of employer’s attendance policy
  • employer prohibited from terminating employee because of absence caused by work-related injury and potential workers compensation claim
  • employer may not discharge employee for excessive absences which are the consequence of a work-related injury; no workers compensation claim had yet been filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.