Coleman v. Lappin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Exemptions 6 and 7(C) are not coextensive and that if information is properly withheld under one exemption the court need not decide whether another exemption applies
• “If the Court determines that information properly is withheld under one exemption, it need not determine whether another exemption applies to that same information.”
• “If the Court determines that information properly is withheld under one exemption, it need not determine whether another exemption applies to that same information.” (citing Simon v. DOJ, 980 F.2d 782, 785 (D.C.Cir.1992))
• “If the Court determines that information properly is withheld under one exemption, it need not determine whether another exemption applies to that same information.” (citing Simon v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., 980 F.2d 782, 785 (D.C. Cir. 1992)). 11 Walker argues that Exemption 7(C

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).