Coleman v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that whether an election law imposes a severe burden is an “intensely factual inquiry”
• observing that “[t]he language of the [NVRA] does not prohibit documentation requirements” and refusing to enjoin Arizona’s documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement
• noting that whether an election law imposes a severe burden is an “intense[ly] factual inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).