Coleman v. Eddy Potash, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that New Mexico recognizes cause of action for intentional spoliation of evidence
• holding that, in deciding whether a duty exists, a court must consider the \general expectation that an owner has a free hand in the manner in which he or she disposes of his or her property\
• recognizing intentional spoliation of evidence claim against third party and not distinguishing between first party and third party claims
• recognizing intentional spoliation of evidence claim against third party and not distinguishing between first party and third party claims
• recognizing the tort of intentional spoliation of evidence by a third party and declining to recognize the independent tort of negligent spoliation of evidence
• stating that worker’s claim against his employer for intentional spoliation of evidence is not barred by WCA’s exclusivity provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).