Coleman v. Coleman
Citations
- 69 Kan. 39
- 76 P. 439
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Wills—Devise C.onslrued—Words “Heirs of His Own” Defined. A testator provided in his will that certain real estate devised to his four sons in equal proportions should not be sold until . the youngest child arrived at the age of majority, and that in case any one of them should die “ without heirs or legal representatives of his own” the survivors should take his portion of the estate equally. An infant son died after the death of the testator. Held, that the-words ‘‘heirs of hi>s own,” when applied to the children of the deceased, meant lineal descendants or issue, and that the mother of the deceased child did not inherit his share of the real estate devised in the will.</p> <p>2. -Estates not Repugnant—Not a Perpetuity. The terms of the will considered, and held, that the remainder over to the children of the testator is not repugnant to the estate previously granted; nor does the will create a perpetuity.</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bullock v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-07-07· cited 36×
- Keeler v. LauerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-04-07· cited 29×
- Dyal v. BruntSupreme Court of Kansas· 1942-03-10· cited 28×
- Neal v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 1909-01-12· cited 23×
- Postlethwaite v. EdsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-03-11· cited 20×
- Cain v. VivierSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-12-11
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.