Skip to main content
· 10/21/2013

Coleman v. Circuit Court of Va.

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 475
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 321
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3234
  • 571 U.S. 975
  • 2013 WL 4402318
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the 21–day safe harbor does not apply [when sanctions are initiated by a court sua sponte] and the court may impose sanctions without providing opportunity to withdraw the misstatement.”
  • noting that sanctions 24 issued pursuant to a motion require that an attorney’s conduct be “objectively unreasonable”
  • noting that sanctions may issue “pursuant to a motion by opposing counsel” upon a showing of “objectively unreasonable” conduct
  • noting that sanctions issued on a party’s motion require that an attorney’s conduct be “objectively unreasonable”
  • noting that sanctions issued on a party’s motion require that an attorney’s conduct be “objectively unreasonable”
  • “[S]ua sponte sanctions ... should issue only upon a finding of subjective bad faith.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.