Skip to main content
· 10/7/2009

Coleman (Parent) Holdings v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 20 So. 3d 952
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14934
  • 2009 WL 3189343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \An evidentiary hearing is unnecessary if a [r]ule 1.540(b) motion merely undertakes to rehash matters previously litigated at trial or raises inconsequential 'de minimus' matters.\
  • “A trial court has broad discretion in evaluating a Rule 1.540(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor, Garcia-Wood, Marina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.